We are living in an era when America is consciously
attempting to erase the painful memories of its past. And as in often the case,
the past needs to be let go of. It is impossible to climb further up a ladder
until we remove our feet from the rung we are on.
However, as human beings often do, we overreact and
the solution becomes more painful, harmful and damaging than what we trying to
forget.
But we all know, and we usually try to incorporate
into our life experiences, the importance of learning lessons from our past. We
all do it. We try not to repeat the same mistakes in relationships or business dealings,
for example, as we did in the past. We don’t set out to destroy the past but to
learn from it. It is what mature adults do. Human progress depends upon it.
But what we are seeing now, as America endeavors to erase
the ties we have to our past, especially to those steeped in racism, bigotry
and prejudice, is an overreaction, if not overkill.
Rarely a day goes by that I do not see where someone
has hand painted on their car window, “Black Lives Matter.” No one disputes
that ideal, for in reality all lives matter. But that is not the message BLM
supporters are sending.
While everyone has heard of George Floyd, few has
heard of Jessica Doty Whitiker, an Indianapolis woman and mother of 24, and a
home care nurse, who was a part of a group of people that when confronted by another
group of people along the canal, lost her life for her ideal.
Tensions arose between the two groups when someone
reportedly used a version of the N-word, offending members of the second group.
When one person said, “Black Lives Matter,” either Jessica or someone in
Jessica’s group returned the declaration with the affirmation, “All Lives
Matter.”
The groups separated without incident but moments
later, as Jessica and her fiancé walked under a bridge, shots rang out and
Jessica was hit and was declared dead at the hospital. Where was the crime,
saying “All Lives Matter?” Should not all lives indeed matter?
Actress Kate Beckinsale criticized someone who had
posted “All Lives Matter” in response to Kate’s post about Breonna Taylor who
was shot by police in her bed. Kate called it “mean-spirited” as she tried to
negate the idea that all lives should matter equally. She explained that
"for some people, black lives don’t matter at all,” presuming that because
someone choses to remind us that all lives matter, they mean Black lives do
not. Are not the lives of Blacks included in the inclusive term “all”? So why
get offended, because to some, Blacks and only Blacks, should get top billing
now.
The Black Lives Matter Movement has gained traction
and some say it has been hijacked by radicals and domestic terrorists. But when
you go to the official BLM website, there is very little spoken of racial
equality, though one would expect that to be declared as its main goal. In its attempt
to to be all inclusive, it makes a special point to lift up the LBGT community and
to reject violence inflicted on the Black community “by the state.”
Their “About” section states, “We are guided by the fact that all
Black lives matter, regardless of actual or perceived sexual identity, gender
identity, gender expression, economic status, ability, disability, religious
beliefs or disbeliefs, immigration status, or location. We make space for
transgender brothers and sisters to participate and lead.
We are self-reflexive and do the work required to dismantle
cisgender privilege and uplift Black trans folk, especially Black trans women
who continue to be disproportionately impacted by trans-antagonistic violence.”
BLM has become a platform to promote equality for “transgender brothers
and sisters” although this motive is not publicized along with “racial equality.”
As they put it, “We foster a queer‐affirming
network. When we gather, we do so with the intention of freeing ourselves from
the tight grip of heteronormative thinking, or rather, the belief that all in
the world are heterosexual (unless s/he or they disclose otherwise).”
It further states, “We disrupt the
Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each
other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one
another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and
children are comfortable.”
The BLM Movement is apparently also determined to “disrupt”
the “nuclear family structure” in favor of the “It takes a village” ideology, ignoring
the importance of the family unit in creating both a unified and healthy
community and nation. In reality, the Black community aborts more babies than
any other race, so their declaration to support the “comfort” of Black parents
seems disingenuous at best, hypocritical at worst.
Racial equality seems to take a back seat to the
ideology presented here. If any hijacking has been done, it has been done by
organizers of BLM themselves under a false pretense of eliminating racism.
We have seen statues of Christopher Columbus, Juan
Ponce de Leon, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln,
General Robert E. Lee, Frederick Douglas, Jefferson Davis and numerous
Confederate soldier statues have been vandalized, decapitated or torn down.
When BLM protestors, or more accurately vandals,
target Abraham Lincoln, who freed the slaves, and Frederick Douglas, himself a
Black man, abolitionist, activist and a former slave himself who dedicated his
life to removing slavery from the American landscape, it is evidence that this
is more about erasing our history than it is about social or racial justice.
The BLM Movement is more than a grassroots
movement, but is backed by large corporations. Companies like Amazon, who gave
$10 million, Microsoft donated $250,000, Unilever gave $350,000, Fitbit, the
Atlantic and Warner records and many more have given all totaling millions
given to the BLM cause.
Other businesses have pledged to stand with BLM
and backed that commitment with donations, Doordash has pledged half a million
dollars as has Deckers, Airbnb, Nabisco, Dropbox, and Gatorade.
Once we understand that BLM is as racist an entity
as any they are pretending to erase, we see the hypocrisy. It exists for the
purpose of promoting Blacks over all others, the very definition of racism, and
it is done in radical ways, supported by those, well-meaning or not, who fund
their destruction of America, its past and its present.
For all its attempts to erase racism from America’s
past, it has dedicated itself to promoting a new form of racism. With the aid
of American companies, who claim to have bought into the vison of a new, racist-free
America, and are giving their support in the seemingly virtuous attempts to
remove racism, they have become devout racists themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment