Islam's Manipulation In the Islamic-American Debate

Using a football game as an analogy, Imam Rauf stated "I am the head coach of this strategic initiative and the President of the United States.... is like a player you want to bring in for a particular play".

He added that it is like moving the ball forward down the football field and asking yourself who can you bring in to move the ball forward in order to score. You have to, he believes, have enough power to push the ball forward, promoting your interests against the interests of the opposition.

Rauf, for all his moderate Muslim conversation is a manipulator who sees himself as the one calling the shots in the NYC mosque debate and in the overall Islamic - American debate. And make no mistake about it, there is an Islamic-American debate going on.

It is not a Freedom of Religion debate, but one system vying for advantage over the other and who wins this debate will shape the landscape of America's tomorrow. He sees himself as the puppeteer pulling the strings of the individuals involved with getting his way and the will of Islam getting its way in America.

Anyone who does not see him as a divisive and dangerous man in America, is blinded by a blanket of tolerance they want to cover everything with in an attempt to seem enlightened and unifying.

"I belong to this neighborhood, ladies and gentlemen," he said. "I'm a devout Muslim. I pray five times a day -- sometimes more, if I can -- and I observe the rituals required by my faith." As a devout Muslim Rauf fully understands the philosophy of Taqiyya, Sacred Deception, by which a Muslim can say anything he wants to a non-Muslim to advance the cause of Islam. As this is permitted, it is not considered a lie by Islam.

Islamic tradition reveals in Bukhari 3,49,857 that Muhammad said, "A man who brings peace to the people by making up good words or by saying nice things, though untrue, does not lie". Can it be more clear that lying in the cause of Allah to bring Islamic peace is not a lie at all in a Muslim's eyes?

In America, our justice system is built upon the concept of right and wrong. In court we swear to "Tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth". Islam teaches that even this oath is changeable.

In Bukhari 8,78,618 it states, "Abu Bakr faithfully kept his oaths until Allah revealed to Muhammad the atonement for breaking them. Afterwards he said, "If I make a pledge and later discover a more worthy pledge, then I will take the better action and make amends for my earlier promise".

In Islam an oath is only honored until something better comes along, such as a reason for breaking it. This is the same principle that makes allowing Muslims to serve in the United States armed forces a foolish policy. Their loyalty remains only until they are called to fight against Allah people, and all bets are off.

In Islam there is no such concept of right and wrong, but rather it is one of what is permissible and what is forbidden. Taqiyya, or lying to a kafir, is permissible and if a Muslim is to follow Muhammad's, the perfect Muslim example, it is not only allowed but recommended.

In any discussion if there is not honesty then the deck is stacked against the one who tries to play by the rules and the cheater has an unfair, and unethical, advantage. In the NYC Ground Zero mosque issue, as with all Islamic issues, Islam is permitted to lie, to spin the truth, to manipulate the game to "advance the ball down the field". The only way we as moral and honorable people can react is to refuse to play any game where liars have the upper hand.

Islam has moved across the entire world by gaining the upper hand by any means possible. Muhammad is an example they ardently follow. For instance, there was an unwritten rule that civilians were not to be attacked civilians in a time of war. Muhammad broke that rule and excused it by stating that whatever advances Islam, or keeps a Muslim from harm, is permitted. He burned fig trees when it was forbidden to destroy food stuffs. If it advanced Islam, it was Allah's will and no punishment will be doled out to the Muslim who follows what Allah allows.

So in this mosque debate, or in any debate we might be engaged in with Islam, the deck is stacked in Islam's favor. We must refuse to play their game on their terms. We must recognize that we are in effect being "played" and refuse to allow it. Liars need to leave the game and that in itself will solve practically every issue we have with Islam on the spot.

Whether we have the guts to take a stand and do that is another question. So many Islamic apologists have crawled from beneath the woodwork that they are like roaches spreading their diseased and unfounded bias everywhere they appear. Facts are denied. Reality is denied and only misconceptions of the peacefulness and humanitarian outreach of Islam is promoted.

Where there is dishonesty involved in any discussion, any conclusion drawn will be a faulty one because the process was tainted. Islam taints all it touches because of its eagerness to corrupt the process for the advantage it gives. Ignorance is its weapon and as long as we adhere to Islam's desire that we remain ignorant, we will have no control over how the game will end.

Just as getting to know a person works until you find out that they have lied about who they are and what their motives were. Then we realize we don't know them at all but only the false front they portrayed. Islam is no different. When lying is used to build the relationship, we will soon realize we never knew Islam at all.

Ever since 9/11 all American should know how Islam wants this game to end. On that September morning, it no longer was a game to us and became a war with winner take all. It is one we cannot afford to be blind to the rules of.

Willful blindness is not an option. Being manipulated is not an option. Playing against a stacked deck is not an option. Losing is not an option. Engaging with eyes wide open is the only option against a dishonest ploy that would ultimately cost us everything if we lose to cheaters.

There Are No "Lone-wolf" Terrorists

How many failed attempts will we endure before the inept terrorist get lucky and pull another 9/11 off? And how long before our government officials grow a backbone and find the courage to admit to the truth that we are at war with Islam, the political philosophy, not the religion?

In truth the religion of Islam is of no consequence. It is an intolerant faith that doesn’t even logically fit into the category of a valid religion. It is the political aspect of Islam that threatens the world’s peace.

The much thrown around phrase “lone wolf” is one that turns my stomach, as ignorance usually does when it is so blatantly and proudly exhibited.

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, quick to ease the hearts and minds of New Yorkers and Americans everywhere, was confident in his statement that the failed attack was probably from some “homegrown, or maybe a mentally deranged person, or somebody with a political agenda that doesn’t like the health-care bill or something.”

Sounds like a backdoor way into laying the groundwork for the “rightwing extremist” theory that is so much more palatable to those in power today than the truth.

So when Faisal Shahzad was arrested on a plane about to leave for Pakistan was it a lucky guess, or did the powers at be already have some indication that it was not an isolated act? They narrowed it down pretty quickly.

Apparently he was on the list of people to keep an eye on but slipped through the cracks. His failed attempt at detonating his SUV full of explosives makes him seem too inept to outsmart the Feds and slip through the cracks. Perhaps they were more inept than he was brilliant and innovative.

Of course, we need to consider the incapability of this administration to call a terrorist a terrorist with the absence of a note from the terrorist saying so, and I suppose many would still find cause to not believe it. Even with Nidal Hasan shouting “Allahu Ackbar” as he shot up Fort Hood the White House was all to quick to dismiss terrorism as a motive at the very beginning of the investigation. Cowardice is unbecoming in a leader, especially of the United States of America.

As long as this administration fails to stand up straight and name our enemy, we will continue to flail around in the dark never understanding why we are not making the strides against Islamic radicalism that must be made.

President Obama has praise the questionable and even contrived “contributions of Islam” to the United States than he has to show any signs of leadership in this war for our survival.

What will tomorrow’s Americans believe about their country if things continue to progress as they are going? If the Islamic written textbooks being used in some of our schools are any indication, our children’s children will herald Muslims for their great achievement in discovering the Americas. Sorry Christopher, but you are becoming a part of America re-written fable-like history as we continue in our quest of appeasement and deferring to Islam. Dhimmitude is alive and well in America.

Is this simply Islamophobia? Does Islamophobia even exist in America today? Certainly it does, but it is not those you might think based on the way the term is flung callously. The fear of Islam has this White House cowering in the corner so afraid to “offend” this “great religion”. That is where the true Islamophobia manifests itself, in those so afraid of offending the offensive that they defer to Islam in all matters pertaining to it. And I guess that bowing in their presence is par for the course as well. And isn’t our president getting so comfortable and good at doing just that?

He is more comfortable at criticizing America for its past than calling the present-day terrorists of Islam what they unmistakably are, terrorist bent on global domination and currently engaged in negating our Constitution and replacing it with Sharia Law.

“Oh, that can’t happen here”, you respond in dismay. Tell that to Afghanistan which is now 97.89% Muslim. And consider these other places where Christianity and other religions were dominate before the creation of intolerant Islam: Algeria, Azerbaijan (part of the former Soviet Union), Bahrain (along the edge of Saudi Arabia), Bangladesh, Brunei, Comoros (an island off the coast of Africa), Egypt, Gaza and the West Bank, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan (of the former Soviet Union), Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan (near China), Lebanon, Libya, Malaysia, Maldives (islands in the Indian Ocean), Mauritania (West Africa), Morocco, Oman (Near Saudi Arabia), Pakistan, Qatar (Eastern edge of Saudi Arabia), Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tajikistan (formerly part of the Soviet Union), Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan (formerly part of the Soviet Union), United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, and Yemen. They all thought their culture was secure as well.

Conquering of these cultures did not come after powerful sermons preached by Muhammad in his day or by some other Islamic cleric down through history but by jihad of the sword, the pen and by financial jihad.

That goal has many times been boasted of and I for one think they mean what they say. There is however one exception, that being taqiyya, the practice of Muhammad-endorsed sacred deception, characterized by the practice of lying to kafirs (non-Muslims, unbelievers) to advance the cause of Islam. Lying to another Muslim is forbidden while lying to unbelievers is encouraged and applauded today as it has been throughout the centuries.

In the religion and philosophy of Islam that claims to be so tolerant, the very fact of the existence in the Islamic mind of the “kafir” promotes the most basic form of racism. It is an ethnic slur. A kafir can be lied to, can never be a Muslim’s friend, can be deceived, owned as a slave, and even killed. The kafir does not even deserve the title of a real human being. Only Muslims are real human beings. The only value they can be is if they are used to promote Islam and nothing else.

When governments try and deal with Islamic nations without understanding this unalterable truth, they are dealing from a position of not only weakness but also one of ignorance. Concessions and compromises cannot be made with kafirs. Dhimmitude begins in and exists only due to ignorance of which this administration seems ever willing to provide.

So what advantage does labeling an act of terrorist provide? Simply an out for the government so they are not forced into taking a stand against the most formidable enemy this world has ever seen, that of political Islam.

We are in a fight for our existence, our future and our very soul. Sadly, it seems that with America playing the dhimmi it is giving Islam the advantage that it needs to creep across the landscape of this great country destined to one day lay in ruins brought about by covert and even overt operation of Islamic conquest. We are aiding an enemy that wants only our submission, as the name “Islam” unashamedly declares.

There are no “lone-wolf” Islamic terrorists. They are all connected in their ideology and determination to strive for a common goal. Our reluctance to admit that will make us less than effective in our attempt to survive as a nation.