Anti-Semitism
is inherent in Islam and ingrained into all Muslims. Muhammad gained power and
became a leader not by preaching Islam but by enforcing Islam, first on the
Jews and then on the rest of the world. Liberals in America talk against
anti-Semitism and at the same time promote the election of Muslims who believe
and act just the opposite. Hitler's Mien Kampf is actually less anti-Semitic
than the Qur'an is, so that should tell any intelligent person how deeply it is
ingrained into the Muslim mindset. But then, being hypocritical is a Democratic
Party trait.
Two
Democratic Party Muslim Congresswomen are perfect examples. Ilhan Oman is the
first person to be allowed to wear a head covering in Congress, even though
there has been a ban on such items since 1837.
Concessions
to Muslim culture is gaining a foothold in American politics. Along with such
seemingly harmless actions as this, comes the more radical ideas as well.
In November of
2012, Omar released this anti-Semitic statement on her Twitter page: “Israel
has hypnotized the world, may Allah awaken the people and help them see the
evil doings of Israel.” Considering she now has a seat on the House Foreign
Affairs Committee, this should be very disconcerting to all who see Israel as
an ally in the Middle East, a beacon of democracy in an otherwise theocratic
landscape.
Another newly-elected
Democratic Party Muslim also shares the same anti-Israeli sentiments. Rashida
Tlaib, along with Omar, has given her support for the Palestinian-led BDS
Movement (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) which has taken a stand against the Israeli
government and its treatment of Palestinians.
Speaker
Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer have both voiced their disapproval of the BDS
Movement in the past, but even though they have called for an apology from Omar
for her anti-Semitic Tweet and obvious outrage against Israel, they have not
taken a very firm stand in reality. It seems easier to let it pass from the
news cycle than to rock the boat of these two new superstars of diversity the
Democrats have help into office.
Although
Omar has apologized, she has not turned from her blaming Israel for the ills of
the Middle East, a typically Islamic stand.
Anti-Semitism
is nothing new to Islam. On his deathbed, their Prophet Muhammad called for the
extinction or exile of every Jew in Arabia and today that country is basically
an apartheid-run country where Jews are not welcome.
Consider
this hypocrisy. Democratic Representative John Yarmuth has called to ban teenagers
from wearing M.A.G.A. hats, saying on Twitter, “I am calling for a total and
complete shutdown of teenagers wearing MAGA hats until we can figure out what
is going on. They seem to be poisoning young minds.” (I had no idea hats could
poison the mind.)
As she spoke
of an incident involving Covington High School students that he was far too
quick to condemn for their behavior before it became evident, through actual complete
video coverage of the event in question, that the charges of racism were unfounded
and false. “The conduct we saw in this video is beyond appalling, but it didn’t
happen in a vacuum. This is a direct result of the racist hatred displayed
daily by the President of the United States who, sadly, some mistake for a role
model.”
Once the
more complete video was released, it showed that this was not the case, but
this Congressman quick-to-judgment moment shows prejudice rampant in the
Democratic Party against anything they can attach to Donald Trump. This example
was used here because he showed an effort, without evidence, to restrict the
wearing of a hat because it represents a President that he disapproves of but he
has said nothing about the wearing of the hijab in Congress which is evidence
of hatred, bigotry and racism against Jews that has been the mainstay of Islam
for 1400 years. Apparently, this symbolism, which represents the oppression of
women in Muslim countries, doesn’t get a rise out of him or any other Democrats,
for that matter.
I see it as
the first of many concessions to Muslims we will continue to make and it should
be noted that every capitulation is an act of dhimmitude on the part of
non-Muslims. Muhammad established the dhimmi class of people when he discovered
that he had found a way to continue to reap the monetary rewards of Jews for
generations whereas simply killing them had a limited and single reward.
He
established that if a Jew, for instance, who lived in a country that Islam had
conquered wanted to continue to practice his/her faith, they could do so after
agreeing to pay the jizya, a tax sometimes amounting to half their yearly
income. As a result of doing this, they were allowed to practice their faith but
under certain very-restrictive circumstances.
Among other
things, non-Muslims could not own expensive horses and if they wanted to ride an
animal, it must be a mule or a donkey, and sometimes they had to ride
backwards. There was even a specially designed saddle with the “horn” on the
back. Funny hats or missed-matched shoes were commanded to be worn by Jews and
other non-Muslims, or a yellow patch on their clothing, so that they could not
be mistaken for a Muslim.
If their
worship services included clapping as a form of worship, their clapping could
not be loud enough to be heard in the street because a Muslim hearing it would
be offended. For Christians, they were allowed to wear a cross around their neck,
but it had to be a large one, weighting over two pounds in some places. Clothing
restrictions also applied.
If it
rained, a Jew was forbidden to go outside for fear that water running off his
body would pool in the street and a Muslim would be defiled if he accidently
stepped in it.
There was
three parts of the behavior of Muslims in the dhimmi state. First, they were
prohibited to be friends with the non-Muslim or of embracing their opinions or
patterns of behavior. Secondly, they were prohibited to even have a discussion
with them. And thirdly, there was the obligation to humiliate them.
The
historical evidence contains volumes of oppressive attitudes towards Jews and
other non-Muslims, and the very fact that we have members of Congress that are
Muslims, should stir the concern of every American.
While
President Trump is accused of being racist, mainly because of his “Muslim Ban,”
a move meant to restrict immigration of people from terrorist-supporting
nations and protect the American people, a move which legally he is entitled to
implement.
Compare that
stretch of the imagination of Democrats who see this as being not in the
interest of the American people, to a fact of Islamic history, that Muhammad
referred to African Negros as “raisin heads.” You should see the obvious double
standard as no Muslim will ever be reminded of their Prophet Muhammad’s own
racism.
Because
Muslims are instructed 14 times in the Qur’an, as well as being reminded by the
example of Muhammad’s life and the instructions of Muslim clerics, that they
are not to be friends with non-Muslims, how can any true Muslim have a fair and
effectual interaction with any non-Muslim? Simply, they cannot.
Taking it
all into consideration, no Muslim should be allowed to hold any office in
America where they are enabled to design or vote on any policies that govern
the life of any non-Muslim or on a larger more global scale, any ally of the
United States.
One last
clarification, before the Muslim apologist chimes in, Islam is more of a
political doctrine than a set of religious principles. It seeks to govern every
aspect of life for Muslim and non-Muslim alike. That makes it political, not
religious. If we would treat it as such, all the discussion and conflict with
American values would resolve itself, for no real American should see as
acceptable the embrace of anyone in government who is anti-American at their
core. It is counterproductive, and simply put, ludicrous.
